ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
The role of coronary artery calcium scoring in the prediction of coronary artery disease based on non-contrast non-cardiac chest CT scans in airline pilots.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to explore the value of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) using non-gated, non-contrast chest computed tomography (NCCT) to predict coronary artery disease (CAD) in airline pilots. Methods: Pilots with coronary calcification found on NCCT were consecutively enrolled into this study. All received a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) examination. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was evaluated on NCCT using the Agatston method. CCTA images were analyzed using a semi-automated software. Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) scoring categorized coronary stenosis. Results: A total of 217 male pilots were included, of which 49 were diagnosed with significant CAD (CAD-RADS category 3 or higher). Pilots with significant CAD had much higher CACS (324.28 ± 389.02 vs. 39.16 ± 68.88; Conclusions: CACS assessed using NCCT was significantly associated with CAD-RADS category 3 or higher, as confirmed by CCTA, which indicates that it may serve as a robust predictor for diagnosing significant CAD among airline pilots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.