Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40343184›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of brain CT volume in 2-year-olds using deep learning model.

Fengjun Xi, Liyun Tu, Feng Zhou, Yanjie Zhou, Jun Ma, Yun Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fengjun XiDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liyun TuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Feng ZhouSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Yanjie ZhouSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Jun MaDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yun PengImaging Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, National Center for Children's Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Our research aims to develop an automated method for segmenting brain CT images in healthy 2-year-old children using the ResU-Net deep learning model. Building on this model, we aim to quantify the volumes of specific brain regions and establish a normative reference database for clinical and research applications. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 1,487 head CT scans of 2-year-old children showing normal radiological findings, which were divided into training ( Results: The ResU-Net model we proposed achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.94 for the training set and 0.96 for the testing set, demonstrating robust segmentation performance. When comparing different models, ResU-Net (3,3,3) model achieved the highest Dice coefficient of 0.96 in the testing set, followed by ResU-Net (1,3,3) model with 0.92, and the baseline 3D U-Net with 0.88. Statistical analysis showed that the brain volume of males was significantly larger than that of females in all brain regions ( Conclusion: This study highlights the effectiveness of deep learning for automatic brain segmentation in pediatric CT imaging, providing a reliable reference for normative brain volumes in 2-year-old children. The findings may serve as a benchmark for clinical assessment and research, complementing existing MRI-based reference data and addressing the need for accessible, population-based standards in pediatric neuroimaging.

Indexed as

brain volumechildrenCTdeep learningsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40343184
PMCPMC12058743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.