ReviewJournal of sleep research2025
The Future of Insomnia Research-There's Still Work to Be Done.
Review in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Wearable Digital Therapeutics in Improving Sleep Outcomes Among Individuals With Insomnia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Sleep Medication Use and Associated Factors Among Adults with Insomnia Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Targeting the microbiota-gut-brain axis in post-stroke insomnia: a phase-dependent therapeutic framework.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- From night-to-night and from person-to-person: dynamic phenomena of insomnia.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- The Effects ofNutrients · 2025Article
- The Future of Insomnia Research-There's Still Work to Be Done.Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insomnia Disorder (ID) is a highly debilitating disorder affecting up to 10% of the general population. In recent years, the number of studies in this area has increased rapidly, resulting in a wealth of accumulated knowledge. ID is generally regarded as a hyperarousal disorder affecting cognitive, emotional, cortical and physiological domains. Nevertheless, there is still a significant lack of knowledge about the pathophysiology of ID. For example, the existence of insomnia subtypes is discussed, albeit no uniform definition has yet been found. Significant progress has been made in understanding the neurobiology of insomnia, which points to a dysfunction in emotion regulation. However, neuroimaging studies frequently have small sample sizes and allow only for limited causal conclusions. The assessment of sleep has been significantly influenced by the increasing availability of methods for ambulatory sleep measurement. While these methods enable sleep to be measured more cost-effectively than polysomnography, many devices lack sufficient empirical evidence of validity. In terms of insomnia treatment, cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has been shown to be highly effective. However, the underlying mechanisms of CBT-I remain partially unclear, and the optimal sequence for applying the individual components, as well as the effectiveness of CBT-I in cases of comorbidity, remain open questions. Furthermore, many widely applied pharmacological treatment approaches are used off-label with only a limited empirical evidence base. This narrative review aims to summarise the current state of research on ID and attempts to outline a selection of the important future challenges in insomnia research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.