SynthesisRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Technologies for healthy lifestyle in people with HIV: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto analyze clinical trials that assessed the effectiveness of technologies for healthy lifestyles in people with HIV.
methodA systematic review, conducted in five databases, with association of controlled descriptors. Complete and electronically available randomized controlled clinical trial articles, without language or date restrictions, involving technologies for healthy lifestyles in people with HIV over 18 years of age were included. Studies involving children, adolescents, pregnant women and repeated articles were excluded. The Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews were used to assess bias and review quality.
resultsA total of 2,933 articles were identified and eight were selected. The technologies were mobile applications, booklets, motivational interviewing and telephone interventions, focusing on self-care, antiretroviral adherence, stress management, fatigue and depression, and encouraging reduction in smoking, alcohol and drug use.
conclusionThe technologies were classified as soft-hard and hard, and improved the lifestyle of people with HIV. Registration in the International Prospective Register Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42023422772.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.