ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Expression of clock genes tracks daily and tidal time in brains of intertidal crustaceans Eurydice pulchra and Parhyale hawaiensis.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Core circadian clock genes control molecular and behavioral circatidal rhythms in Parhyale hawaiensis.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Evolutionary and physiological arguments for the existence of a circalunar clock in humans.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Biological rhythms: Living your life, one half-day at a time.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intertidal organisms, such as the crustaceans Eurydice pulchra and Parhyale hawaiensis, express daily and tidal rhythms of physiology and behavior to adapt to their temporally complex environments. Although the molecular-genetic basis of the circadian clocks driving daily rhythms in terrestrial animals is well understood, the nature of the circatidal clocks driving tidal rhythms remains a mystery. Using in situ hybridization, we identified discrete clusters of ∼60 putative "clock" cells co-expressing canonical circadian clock genes across the protocerebrum of E. pulchra and P. hawaiensis brains. In field-collected, tidally rhythmic E. pulchra sampled under a light:dark (LD) cycle, the expression of period (per) and cryptochrome 2 (cry2) exhibited daily rhythms in particular cell groups, whereas timeless (tim) showed 12-h rhythms in others. In tidally rhythmic laboratory-reared P. hawaiensis, previously entrained to 12.4-h cycles of agitation under LD and sampled under continuous darkness, several cell groups (e.g., medioposterior cells) exhibited circadian expression of per and cry2. In contrast, dorsal-lateral cells in the protocerebrum exhibited robust ∼12-h, i.e., circatidal, rhythms of per and cry2, phased to the prior tidal agitation but not the prior LD. In P. hawaiensis exhibiting daily behavior under LD without tidal agitation, robust daily rhythms of per and cry2 expression were evident in medioposterior and other cells, whereas expression in dorsal-lateral cells was not rhythmic, underlining their essentially tidal periodicity. These results implicate canonical circadian molecules in circatidal timekeeping and reveal conserved brain networks as potential neural substrates for the generation of daily and tidal rhythms appropriate to intertidal habitats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.