ReviewJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2025
Implementation and clinical utility of multigene panels for bleeding, platelet, and thrombotic disorders.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multigene panel analysis of connective tissue and vascular genes in patients with a bleeding disorder of unknown cause or a cerebrovascular event.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Revisiting thrombophilia testing: leveraging next-generation sequencing for precision in VTE management.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing, with its capacity to simultaneously sequence large volumes of genomic data, has evolved from a research-focused technology to a clinical tool. This review outlines key steps in the development of a clinical hemostasis and thrombosis genetics service leveraging a multigene panel. We discuss its value across inherited bleeding, platelet, and thrombotic disorders (BPTDs) in the context of published studies utilizing multigene panels for these conditions. Benefits of sequencing include establishing a diagnosis through the simultaneous assessment of multiple candidate genes, exclusion of genocopies, and predictions of phenotype to deliver targeted therapy. The presence of concomitant variants may modify phenotype; however, predictions on disease course from oligogenic modifiers are not yet used to guide patient care or counseling. Limitations in the widespread roll-out of multigene panels for clinical diagnosis of BPTDs exist. These challenges relate to detection of structural variants, variable diagnostic hit rates, and management of incidental findings. Variants of uncertain significance also frustrate diagnostic yield. Family segregation studies, in vitro characterization, and protein modeling aid interpretation of variant pathogenicity. Although multigene panels offer substantial opportunities to improve BPTD diagnostics, their implementation should be guided by appropriate expertise and in conjunction with clinical research to ensure safe and ethical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.