Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40345836›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Target Selection Signals Causally Influence Human Perceptual Decision-Making.

Daniel J Pearce, Gerard M Loughnane, Trevor T-J Chong, Nele Demeyere, Jason B Mattingley, Margaret J Moore, Peter W New, Redmond G O'Connell, Megan H O'Neill, Dragan Rangelov and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel J PearceSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia daniel.pearce1@monash.edu mark.bellgrove@monash.edu.
Gerard M LoughnaneNational College of Ireland, Dublin D01 K6W2, Republic of Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-5294
Trevor T-J ChongSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Nele DemeyereNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, United Kingdom.
Jason B MattingleyQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-9216
Margaret J MooreNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, United Kingdom.
Peter W NewAged and Rehabilitation Division, Medical Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3192, Australia.
Redmond G O'ConnellSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Megan H O'NeillSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Dragan RangelovQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7648-6447
Renerus J StolwykSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Sam S WebbDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, United Kingdom.
Shou-Han ZhouDepartment of Psychology, James Cook University, Brisbane, Queensland 4811, Australia.
Méadhbh B BrosnanSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Mark A BellgroveSchool of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia daniel.pearce1@monash.edu mark.bellgrove@monash.edu.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to form decisions is a foundational cognitive function which is impaired across many psychiatric and neurological conditions. Understanding the neural processes underpinning clinical deficits may provide insights into the fundamental mechanisms of decision-making. The N2c has been identified as an EEG signal indexing the efficiency of early target selection, which subsequently influences the timing of perceptual reports through modulating neural evidence accumulation rates. Evidence for the contribution of the N2c to human decision-making however has thus far come from correlational research in neurologically healthy individuals. Here, we capitalized on the superior temporal resolution of EEG to show that unilateral brain lesions in male and female humans were associated with specific deficits in both the timing and strength of the N2c in the damaged hemisphere, with corresponding deficits in the timing of perceptual reports contralaterally. The extent to which the N2c influenced clinical deficits in perceptual reporting speed depended on neural rates of evidence accumulation. This work provides causal evidence that the N2c indexes an early, hemisphere-specific process supporting human decision-making. This noninvasive EEG marker could be used to monitor novel approaches for remediating clinical deficits in perceptual decision-making across a range of brain disorders.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultAgedElectroencephalographyFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adultattentiondecision-makingEEGperceptionreaction timestroke

Identifiers

PMID40345836
PMCPMC12160395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.