ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-user joint task offloading and resource allocation based on mobile edge computing in mining scenarios.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Learning-Guided Meta-Heuristic Approach for Task Offloading in Four-Tier IoT Networks: A Hybrid UCB-ACO Algorithm.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Performance evaluation of tunicate-enhanced NGO resource optimization in RF energy harvesting-assisted NOMA edge computing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adaptive and intelligent customized deep Q-network for energy-efficient task offloading in mobile edge computing environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the development of the industrial internet of things, an increasing number of intelligent terminal devices are being deployed in mining operations. However, due to the surge in network traffic and the limited availability of computational resources, these terminal devices face challenges in meeting high-performance requirements such as low transmission latency and low energy consumption. To address this issue, this paper proposes a method that combines partial offloading with collaborative mobile edge computing (MEC). This approach leverages device-to-device communication to partition computational tasks into multiple subtasks, offloading some of them to collaborative devices or MEC servers for execution. This not only alleviates the computational burden on MEC servers but also makes full use of the idle computing resources of terminal devices, thereby enhancing resource utilization efficiency. Given the limited computational capacity of terminal devices, this paper optimizes the offloading decision-making process between terminal devices and MEC servers. By introducing weighted coefficients for latency and energy consumption, the proposed method ensures that task completion latency does not exceed a predefined threshold while minimizing the overall system cost. The problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem, which is solved using a two-layer alternating optimization framework. In the upper layer, an improved genetic algorithm (IGA) based on heuristic rules is employed to generate an offloading decision population, while the lower layer utilizes the deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm to optimize the offloading strategy and the weighted coefficients for latency and energy consumption. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we compare it with five baseline algorithms: the improved grey wolf optimizer metaheuristic algorithm, the traditional genetic algorithm, the binary offloading decision mechanism, the partial non-cooperative mechanism, and the fully local execution mechanism. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed IGA-DDPG algorithm achieves significant improvements over these baseline methods. Specifically, under various experimental scenarios, IGA-DDPG reduces latency by an average of 24.5%, decreases energy consumption by 26.3%, and lowers overall system cost by 44.6%. Moreover, the algorithm consistently ensures a 100% task completion rate under different system configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.