ArticleEndocrine2025
Time-divided hypoglycemia management derived by continuous glucose monitoring may reduce microvascular diseases in type 2 diabetes patients.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the association between hypoglycemia exposure and the risk of developing microvascular diseases (MVDs) in type 2 diabetes patients via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), aiming to identify optimal hypoglycemia thresholds for improved glucose management.
methodsA total of 174 type 2 diabetes patients underwent 2 weeks of CGM. Binary multivariate logistic regression assessed the association between hypoglycemia exposure and MVDs prevalence at thresholds of 3.0-3.9 mmol/L.
resultsAfter 14 days of monitoring, 79.9% of patients experienced hypoglycemia. The MVDs group had a significantly greater percentage of participants with hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.4 mmol/L: 57.6 vs. 39.8%, P = 0.023) and nocturnal hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.9 mmol/L: 62.1 vs. 46.3%, P = 0.043), with no significant difference in daytime hypoglycemia. After adjustment for confounders, only nocturnal hypoglycemia was independently associated with the risk of developing MVDs, and the prevalence of MVDs was positively associated with hypoglycemia severity. When the hypoglycemia threshold was reduced from 3.4-3.0 mmol/L, the odds ratio increased from 1.342 (1.026, 1.798) to 1.855 (1.141, 3.457). Further subgroup analysis revealed that nocturnal hypoglycemia below 3.4 mmol/L was a risk factor for the development of retinopathy and neuropathy (P < 0.05) but not for nephropathy.
conclusionNighttime glucose levels below 3.4 mmol/L are strongly associated with a greater risk of developing retinopathy and neuropathy in type 2 diabetes patients. Thus, blood glucose management should be time-specific, with daytime levels maintained above 3.9 mmol/L and nighttime levels maintained above 3.4 mmol/L.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40346326What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.