Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346351›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025

Predicting Knee Osteoarthritis Severity from Radiographic Predictors: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Teemu A T Nurmirinta, Mikael J Turunen, Jussi Tohka, Mika E Mononen, Mimmi K Liukkonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Teemu A T NurmirintaDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. teemu.nurmirinta@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3073-1419
Mikael J TurunenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jussi TohkaAI Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mika E MononenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mimmi K LiukkonenDiagnostic Imaging Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, The Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

Finnish Cultural Foundation 00240906Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta 328920Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta 352666Research Council of Finland 358944Sigrid Juselius Foundation 240130State Research Funding for university-level health research, Kuopio University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of North Savo 50TP006State Research Funding for university-level health research, Kuopio University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of North Savo 50TP009State Research Funding for university-level health research, Kuopio University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of North Savo 5654242Wellcome Trust 324994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treatment, preventive measures to reduce its onset risk are a key factor. Among individuals with radiographically healthy knees, however, future knee joint integrity and condition cannot be predicted by clinically applicable methods. We investigated if knee joint morphology derived from widely accessible and cost-effective radiographs could be helpful in predicting future knee joint integrity and condition.

methodsWe combined knee joint morphology with known risk predictors such as age, height, and weight. Baseline data were utilized as predictors, and the maximal severity of KOA after 8 years served as a target variable. The three KOA categories in this study were based on Kellgren-Lawrence grading: healthy, moderate, and severe. We employed a two-stage machine learning model that utilized two random forest algorithms. We trained three models: the subject demographics (SD) model utilized only SD; the image model utilized only knee joint morphology from radiographs; the merged model utilized combined predictors. The training data comprised an 8-year follow-up of 1222 knees from 683 individuals.

resultsThe SD- model obtained a weighted F1 score (WF1) of 77.2% and a balanced accuracy (BA) of 65.6%. The Image-model performance metrics were lowest, with a WF1 of 76.5% and BA of 63.8%. The top-performing merged model achieved a WF1 score of 78.3% and a BA of 68.2%.

conclusionOur two-stage prediction model provided improved results based on performance metrics, suggesting potential for application in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Knee JointMachine LearningOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographySeverity of Illness IndexImagingMachine learningMulticlass predictionOAISeverityX-ray

Identifiers

PMID40346351
PMCPMC12283875

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.