SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Are there any complications after lateral extra-articular tenodesis in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? - a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Femoral Fixation Techniques for Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Proposed Collision-Aware Planning Framework.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Addition of anterolateral ligament reconstruction to primary hamstring autograft ACLR improves objective rotatory stability and reduces re-tear rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Article
- Extra-articular Tenodesis for ACL Reconstruction: Who Needs it and is there a Superior Technique?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Anterior tibial translation versus rotational instability in ACL reconstruction: Defining the problem before choosing the procedure.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Role of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in anterior cruciate ligament-injured athletes.Annals of joint · 2026Review
- Technical Details of Lateral Tenodesis at the Fascia Lata: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is a surgical technique that can be used in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), improving rotational stability and reducing the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) re-rupture. However, as with any surgical procedure, LET carries a risk of complications. Despite numerous articles published in recent decades discussing LET in the context of ACLR, relatively few complications associated with the LET procedure have been documented in the literature. This study aimed to systematically review adverse events associted with the LET procedure when combined with ACLR. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe following key terms were used: (extra-articular OR extraarticular) AND (tenodesis OR plasty OR augmentation OR procedure or reconstruction OR reconstructive OR surgical OR surgery OR technique) AND (ACL OR anterior cruciate ligament), with no limits regarding the year of publication in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Embase databases. English-language clinical human studies with evidence levels I-IV were included.
resultsThis analysis evaluated seven articles published between 1999 and 2023. Level IV evidence was identified in the majority of studies (n = 5), level III evidence was found in one (n = 1), and level I evidence was noted in another (n = 1). Nine distinct types of complications were identified with rates rangingfrom 0.6% to 17% across the analysed studies. The modified Lemaire technique had the highest complication rate, reaching 7.5%. Overall, the complication rate across all reviewed LET techniques in this study was 4.2%.
conclusionThis is the first study to systematically document the occurrence of complications in LET. The most common problems included LET hardware irritation - predominantly after staple fixation, and subsequent removal, haematoma over the LET site, and pain over the LET site. The analysed studies show that combining LET with ACLR appears to be a safe procedure associated with infrequent and mild side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.