Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346599›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2025

Physical therapy vs. glucocorticoid injection in patients with meniscal tears and knee osteoarthritis: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial.

Mingzhu Lee, Chao Jing, Kainan Lee

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingzhu Lee *Sichuan Taikang Hospital, No. 881 Xianghe 1 Street, Huayang Community, Tianfu New Area, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Chao Jing *The Sports Science Research Institute of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, China.
Kainan LeeSichuan Taikang Hospital, No. 881 Xianghe 1 Street, Huayang Community, Tianfu New Area, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. likainan1961@126.com.

Funding

2024 Sichuan Medical Association Orthopaedics (Shang An Tong) Special Research Project 2024SAT03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical therapy is commonly recommended for treating meniscus tears and knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, data from randomized trials that compare the effectiveness of this treatment with that of glucocorticoid injections are lacking.

methodsThis randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial included 273 patients with KOA who were divided into either the physical therapy group (n = 133) or the glucocorticoid injection group (n = 140). The physical therapy included kinesiology tape, exercise protocols, and exercise training programs to increase core stability and periprosthetic muscle strength. The primary endpoint was the overall Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score at 1 year. Additionally, proprioception and safety were assessed. All analyses were performed with the use of the intention-to-treat approach. The data are reported as percentages (%) (n), and the threshold for statistical significance was p < 0.05.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.05). The average (± SD) WOMAC score at 1-year was 76.85 ± 2.50 in the physiotherapy group. And 99.55 ± 2.09 in the glucocorticoid injection group (mean difference = - 22.70; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] - 23.43 to - 21.96; p < 0.001). Compared with the glucocorticoid injection group, the physical therapy group exhibited superior performance in terms of proprioception, especially in the eyes-closed in situ stepping test (14.27 ± 0.75 versus 5.98 ± 0.74; mean difference = 8.29; 95% CI 8.09-8.50; p < 0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events at the 1-year follow-up was comparable between the two groups. Most of these events were determined to be complications arising from physical therapy and glucocorticoid injection.

conclusionsThe results revealed that pain, quality of life, and balance were greater in the physiotherapy group than in the glucocorticoid injection group within the 1-year study period. However, the long-term effects beyond this timeframe remain unknown, and future studies with extended follow-up times are needed to confirm the sustainability of these benefits.

trial registrationThe protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the ethical commission of the Hebei Sports Science Research Institute (SEC20200213019) and Ethics Committee of Sichuan Taikang Hospital (SCTK-IRB-032). The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000032508).

Indexed as

GlucocorticoidsOsteoarthritis, KneePhysical Therapy ModalitiesTibial Meniscus InjuriesAgedFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeGlucocorticoidsGlucocorticoid injectionKnee osteoarthritisMeniscal tearPhysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID40346599
PMCPMC12065295

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.