ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
An overview of reviews on digital health interventions during COVID- 19 era: insights and lessons for future pandemics.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of virtual reality disaster education on the performance of nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- An integrated evaluation framework for synthetic clinical data in severely imbalanced settings: fidelity, privacy-risk profiling, and diagnostic utility.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Outcome measurement for multiple long-term conditions research across health-care settings - an overview of reviews.BMC medicine · 2026Review
- AI-driven big data analysis and predictive modeling of infectious disease immunity: from correlates to causal, multiscale understanding.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Implementation and user acceptance of a domestic robot-assisted surgical training system: a pilot educational study at the first clinical medical college of Jinan university.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk of drug-related aggression in pediatric populations: a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FAERS database.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Building an integrated cardiogeriatric heart failure pathway for very old adults: a four-year community case study from Hôpital La Porte Verte.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators in preventing and managing parastomal hernias: a qualitative study from the perspective of enterostomal therapist.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Institutionalizing convergence education for medical artificial intelligence.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Developing a Quick Isolation Bed Inquiry System During the COVID-19 Outbreak: User-Centered Design Approach Based on the Toyota Production System.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Health Behaviors in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Public awareness and perception of robotic-assisted surgery: a cross-sectional analysis of sociodemographic influences.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID- 19 pandemic has significantly impacted global health, underscoring the crucial role of digital health solutions. The World Health Organization's Classification of Digital Interventions, Services, and Applications in Health (CDISAH) provides a framework for categorizing these technologies. This study aims to analyze the adoption and trends of digital health interventions during the COVID- 19 pandemic, mapping them to the CDISAH framework to identify the most and least utilized interventions and technologies.
methodsThis overview-of-reviews study was conducted from 1 st January 2020 to 30 th December 2023, focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses retrieved from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ProQuest. Additionally, gray literature was identified through searches on the Google Scholar platform and reviewing the citations and reference lists of the included studies. The findings were qualitatively mapped to the CDISAH framework.
resultsA total of 64 review articles were analyzed. A content analysis of the included studies identified 292 codes related to healthcare providers, 257 codes related to data services, 88 codes related to individuals, and 43 codes related to health management and support personnel. The results revealed that the most frequent interventions were associated with telemedicine and data management subcategories, while gaps were identified in areas such as individual-based data reporting during the pandemic, highlighting the need for individuals to take a more active role in managing their own health in preparation for future crises.
conclusionsThis study identifies both the strengths and weaknesses of the current digital health landscape. It emphasizes the transformative impact of digital health technologies during the COVID- 19 pandemic and provides a roadmap for future improvements in digital health interventions. By providing a comprehensive overview of digital health during this period, the study underscores the importance of implementing robust digital health strategies within the healthcare system to address existing gaps, leverage strengths, and enhance preparedness and resilience in future public health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.