Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40346776›Full record

SynthesisCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Socioeconomic Status and Breast Cancer Treatment in the United States: Results From a Systematic Literature Review.

Sreelatha Akkala, Mohammed Zuber, Julie Alaere Atta, Nompumelelo O Mzizi, Jyothi Akkula

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sreelatha AkkalaSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4061-9839
Mohammed ZuberCollege of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4842-7551
Julie Alaere AttaSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Nompumelelo O MziziSchool of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Jyothi AkkulaIndependent Researcher, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundIn 2024, breast cancer is the second most common cancer globally, affecting 2.3 million women. In the United States (US), 310 720 new female breast cancer cases were estimated in 2024. Existing research has identified substantial disparities in breast cancer treatment and survival based on socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examines the association between the key SES indicators income, education, and occupation on breast cancer outcomes among the US breast cancer patients.MethodsAn electronic search was conducted using Medline®, Embase®, and Web of Science, from inception to December 2023. Observational studies examining the influence of SES indicators on breast cancer outcomes, including treatment receipt, adherence, and survival, were included. Data were summarized qualitatively due to heterogeneity in SES measures and outcome definitions.ResultsOf 2600 studies retrieved from the searches, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria (19 cohort, 4 cross-sectional). Women with lower SES were less likely to receive or experience delay in receiving the recommended treatment than women with higher SES. In addition, women with low household income (<$25,000) were more likely to report discontinuations in therapy as compared to women with an income of $50,000 or more. Education level influenced treatment adherence and timely care, with higher educational attainment linked to improved survival rates. Occupational status impacted treatment continuity, with low-wage jobs and inflexible work schedules contributing to delays and discontinuation of care.ConclusionSES significantly influences breast cancer care and survival, with lower SES associated with delayed treatment, poorer adherence, and worse outcomes. Healthcare interventions and policies focusing on equitable access to quality care tailored to all women, regardless of their socioeconomic background, may improve breast cancer outcomes for the patients with various demographic characteristics in the US.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealthcare DisparitiesSocial ClassFemaleHumansSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statesaccess to carebreast cancerbreast cancer treatment disparitieshealth care disparitiessocial determinants of healthsocioeconomic statustreatment delay

Identifiers

PMID40346776
PMCPMC12064903

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.