ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Two-year outcomes of treat-and-extend regimen with intravitreal faricimab for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Faricimab 6 mg Versus Aflibercept 8 mg in Treatment-Naïve Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Protocol-Standardised In Silico Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Visual Gains with Faricimab vs Aflibercept 8 mg in Naïve Retinovascular Disease: Global Real-World Cases and Literature Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe previously reported 1-year outcomes of a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen with intravitreal faricimab (IVF) for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Herein, we evaluated the second-year results of this TAE regimen with IVF in eyes completing the first-year treatment. STUDY
designRetrospective, interventional case series.
methodsWe retrospectively studied 30 eyes with treatment-naïve nAMD that had completed the initial year of treatment, assessing best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness (FT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), total number of injections over 2 years, and intended injection interval at the last visit.
resultsTwenty-five eyes completed the 2-year IVF treatment. There was no significant difference between pre-treatment and 2 years post-treatment BCVA. FT and CCT both showed significant reductions, maintained during the 2-year study period. The total number of injections was 10.1 ± 1.2 over the 2 years. The intended injection interval at the last visit was 13.0 ± 3.4 weeks. Of 5 eyes not completing 2 years of IVF treatment, 4 were switched to other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents due to persistent fluids despite IVF at 8-week intervals. In the remaining eye, IVF treatment was discontinued due to suspected faricimab-related intraocular inflammation.
conclusionsThe TAE regimen with IVF for treatment-naïve nAMD was effective during a 2-year period for improving exudative changes and maintaining visual acuity. Although IVF was found to be a relatively safe treatment for nAMD, there were cases requiring a switch to other anti-VEGF agents due to inadequate fluid control effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40347367What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.