ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025
Genetic diseases underlying a spectrum of fetal effusions.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cytogenetic and Molecular Findings in Hydrops-Related Mirror Syndrome.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Incremental yield of genome sequencing after exome sequencing for nonimmune hydrops fetalis spectrum.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2026Article
- The Importance of Clinical Acumen for Prenatal Diagnosis in an Increasingly Technological World.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Evolving Features of RASopathies Among Pregnancies With Abnormal Fetal Fluid Collections.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- The Clinical Utility of Sequence-Based Genetic Testing for Fetal Edema Following Non-Diagnostic Microarray Results: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- The role of reanalyses in genomic sequencing for fetal effusions.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #75: Evaluation and management of non-immune hydrops fetalis.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Insights Into Congenital Lymphatic Anomalies Underlying Fetal Effusions.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesNonimmune hydrops fetalis is well understood to be heterogenous and the common endpoint of many genetic diseases. However, less is known about the prevalence and presenting features of genetic diseases that underlie other types of fetal effusions such as single effusions, leaving uncertainty in clinical practice about optimal approaches to testing and counseling for these pregnancies. We aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing by type of fetal effusion and presence of concurrent structural abnormalities and to identify the unique presenting features of underlying genetic diseases. STUDY
designWe conducted a prospective cohort study of pregnancies with nonimmune hydrops fetalis and other fetal effusions, with participants enrolled from across the United States. Inclusion criteria were nondiagnostic results of chromosomal microarray and/or karyotype and the presence of at least 1 fetal effusion, including nuchal translucency ≥3.5 mm, cystic hygroma, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, ascites, and/or skin edema. Exome sequencing was performed by our institution's Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-approved laboratory and results were returned to participants and their providers. Detailed fetal phenotypic data were ascertained and used to inform genetic variant interpretation, including fetal imaging findings (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and echocardiogram), pathology reports, and laboratory reports. Pregnancies with a variant or variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic were considered diagnostic or positive. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing by the type of fetal effusion, with and without concurrent structural abnormalities. Secondary outcomes were the types of fetal effusions observed by category of genetic disease.
resultsIn all, 118 pregnancies with nonimmune hydrops fetalis and other effusions underwent exome sequencing and 23% (27/118) had positive (diagnostic) findings. Pregnancies with nonimmune hydrops fetalis with and without concurrent structural abnormalities had diagnostic yields of 21% (9/42) and 40% (6/15), respectively (P=.15). Single effusions such as pleural effusion with and without concurrent structural abnormalities had diagnostic yields of 23% (6/26) and 17% (1/6), respectively (P=.61). The diagnostic yield for increased nuchal translucency or cystic hygroma was significantly greater for pregnancies with concurrent structural abnormalities (42%, 5/12) compared to those without (0%, 0/17, P<.01). We further observed numerous patterns in terms of how genetic diseases present in utero, such as RASopathies and musculoskeletal disorders demonstrating all types of effusions, while other disorders marked by neurodevelopmental delays after birth demonstrated all types of effusions except for nonimmune hydrops fetalis.
conclusionThe diagnostic yield of exome sequencing was high across all types of effusions including single effusions with and without concurrent structural abnormalities, with the exception of isolated increased nuchal translucency or cystic hygroma. Furthermore, we observed numerous patterns in terms of how genetic diseases present in utero with fetal effusions. These findings contribute important information for counseling and clinical management, highlight the utility of exome sequencing for fetal effusions beyond nonimmune hydrops fetalis, and inform accurate results of phenotype-driven tests such as exome sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.