ArticleScientific data2025
Time-course liver microarray data from 0 to 14 days in a 70% partial hepatectomy mouse model.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chlorogenic acid promotes liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy through activating Nrf2 via directly targeting Keap1.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The liver is capable of regeneration, regaining mass through compensatory hypertrophy even after resecting 70% of its mass. However, the underlying regenerative mechanism remains poorly understood. Thus, in this study, microarray data were procured over time, from 0 to 14 days post-70% partial hepatectomy (PH) in mice. This dataset was correlated with the body weight and liver weight measured at the time of liver harvest, allowing us to determine the progress of compensatory hypertrophy in each sample. Furthermore, the impact of individual differences in regenerative capacity was analyzed by preparing three biological replicates at each time point. The microarray data were confirmed to be of high quality based on the RNA integrity number and QC stats of the dataset. The reliability of the dataset was further supported by the results of hierarchical clustering and the expression variation of cell cycle-related genes. This microarray data will contribute to the elucidation of the regenerative mechanism in the 70% PH model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.