Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40348810›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Bold zebrafish (Danio rerio) learn faster in a classical associative learning task.

Jamie Corcoran, Levi Storks, Ryan Y Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jamie CorcoranUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha Psychology Department, Omaha, NE, USA. Jcorcoran@unomaha.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0236-672X
Levi StorksUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha Biology Department, Omaha, NE, USA.
Ryan Y WongUniversity of Nebraska at Omaha Psychology Department, Omaha, NE, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation IOS-1942202University of Nebraska Omaha GRACA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals vary between individuals in their ability to learn and some sources of this variation can be the learning process and the individual's personality type. We investigated the relationship between learning and the bold-shy behavioral type by comparing performance of bold and shy zebrafish in conditioned place preference (CPP) and 2-choice tasks. Bold zebrafish learned significantly faster than the shy fish but there were no differences in their final performance in the CPP. When tested in the 2-choice task, we found no clear evidence of learning, however bold fish made more initial choices than shy fish. Overall, our study suggests that bold zebrafish tend to be faster learners when compared to shy zebrafish. The lack of differences in the final change in behavior suggests that learning differences may be due to how the animals initially interact with stimuli because of differences in neophobia.

Indexed as

Association LearningConditioning, ClassicalZebrafishAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorMaleAssociative learningBoldCognitionPersonalityShy

Identifiers

PMID40348810
PMCPMC12065844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.