ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-parametric quantitative evaluation of murine cervical remodeling during pregnancy and postpartum.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spectral photoacoustic imaging of age-related reproductive tract collagen changes in a mouse model of prolapse.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Progesterone regulation of cervix ripening in preterm and term birth in mice.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical remodeling during pregnancy is a critical process that, if untimely, can lead to complications such as preterm birth (PTB). This study introduces a novel multi-parametric approach combining non-invasive imaging modalities to quantify cervical tissue changes during pregnancy and postpartum in a murine model. By integrating ultrasound-based measurements of cervical length, photoacoustic imaging of the collagen-to-water ratio, and elastography for tissue elasticity alongside histological assessments, this method provides a comprehensive evaluation of cervical remodeling. The findings reveal that combining these parameters significantly improves the accuracy of gestational age prediction compared to individual measurements, with a tri-parametric model achieving 85.3% prediction accuracy compared to 65.4% accuracy with histological analysis alone. This approach not only enhances the understanding of cervical remodeling but also holds potential as a minimally invasive, point-of-care diagnostic tool for early detection of cervical ripening and PTB risk. Ultimately, these advancements could inform clinical strategies for pregnancy management and labor induction, improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.