Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40348861›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning model to predict sepsis in ICU patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Lei Tang, Ye Li, Ji Zhang, Feng Zhang, Qiaoling Tang, Xiangbin Zhang, Sai Wang, Yupeng Zhang, Siyuan Ma, Ran Liu and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lei TangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Ye LiDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Ji ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Feng ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Qiaoling TangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Xiangbin ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Sai WangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Yupeng ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Siyuan MaDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Ran LiuDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Lei ChenDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Junyi MaDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Xuelun ZouDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Tianxing YaoDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Rongmei TangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Huifang ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Lianxu WuDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Yexiang YiDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Yi ZengDepartment of Geriatrics, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Duolao WangDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. duolao.wang@lstmed.ac.uk.
Le ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Jiangxi, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. zlzdzlzd@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Central South University Research Programme of Advanced Interdisciplinary Projects in Changsha Studies 2023QYJC011Hunan Provincial Health High-Level Talent Scientific Research Project R2023069Major Science and Technology Projects in Changsha kq2301008The Changsha Municipal Natural Science Foundation kq2202022The Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation 2023JJ60383The Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 2023JJ60144The Major Basic Research Projects in Hunan Province 2024JC0004The National Natural Science Foundation of China 82471364The National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China 2018FY100900The Provincial Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talents Project 2021RC4014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are highly susceptible to sepsis. This study evaluates the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in predicting sepsis risk in intensive care units (ICUs) patients with ICH. We conducted a retrospective analysis on ICH patients using the MIMIC-IV database, randomly dividing them into training and validation cohorts. We identified sepsis prognostic factors using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and backward stepwise logistic regression. Several machine learning algorithms were developed and assessed for predictive accuracy, with external validation performed using the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). We analyzed 2,214 patients, including 1,550 in the training set, 664 in the validation set, and 513 for external validation using the eICU-CRD. The Random Forest (RF) model outperformed others, achieving Area Under the Curves (AUCs) of 0.912 in training, 0.832 in internal validation, and 0.798 in external validation. Neural Network and Logistic Regression models recorded training AUCs of 0.840 and 0.804, respectively. ML models, especially the RF model, effectively predict sepsis in ICU patients with ICH, enabling early identification and management of high-risk cases.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageMachine LearningSepsisAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsIntracerebral hemorrhageMachine learningPrediction modelSepsis

Identifiers

PMID40348861
PMCPMC12065919

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.