Evidence mapPaperPMID 40349007Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Unveiling the twin epidemics of hypertension and diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis of sex-specific prevalence, risk, and hotspots in India's epidemiological transition zones.

Nishikant Singh, Sudheer Kumar Shukla, Pratheeba John, Rimjhim Bajpai, Prince Chugh, Rituparna Sengupta, Ritesh Ranjan Pushkar, Nishant Yadav, Navin Singh, Rajeev Sadanandan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nishikant Singh *Health Systems Transformation Platform, New Delhi, India. nishiiips@gmail.com.
Sudheer Kumar Shukla *Health Systems Transformation Platform, New Delhi, India.
Pratheeba JohnHealth Systems Transformation Platform, New Delhi, India.
Rimjhim BajpaiPopulationCouncil Consulting Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India.
Prince ChughHealth Systems Transformation Platform, New Delhi, India.
Rituparna SenguptaIndependent Researcher, New Delhi, India.
Ritesh Ranjan PushkarDirectorate of Census Operations Odisha, Office of the Registrar General of India, Bhubaneswar, India.
Nishant YadavJawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Navin SinghKing George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Rajeev SadanandanHealth Systems Transformation Platform, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, which often coexist and significantly contribute to the burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), is increasing in India. This study examines the sex-stratified prevalence, coexistence, and bidirectional risks of hypertension and diabetes across states with varying epidemiological transition levels (ETLs) and identifies high-burden hotspots.

methodsThis study analysed data from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey, covering 614,426 women and 556,199 men aged 30 years and above, with biomarker information on both diabetes and hypertension. The age-standardized prevalence was estimated, and adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) were obtained on multivariate logit scale. Bivariate maps, spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analyses were conducted using ArcGIS Pro to identify geographic clusters associated with twin epidemics.

resultsIndividuals diagnosed with hypertension or diabetes were, on average, nearly a decade older than those without. Hypertension prevalence was 30.3% (95%CI:30.14-30.48) among men and 28.6% (95%CI:28.47-28.79) among women, whereas diabetes prevalence was at 19.7% (95%CI:19.58-19.88) in men and 17.4% (95%CI:17.22-17.50) in women. Among individuals with diabetes, 43.1% (95%CI:42.67-43.53) of men and 43.9% (95%CI:43.48-44.36) of women had hypertension, whereas 28.1% (95%CI:27.75-28.37) of hypertensive men and 26.6% (95%CI:26.33-26.93) of hypertensive women were diabetic. Hotspots for twin epidemics were identified in coastal regions, including the southern states with high ETLs, as well as the northern states with high-ETLs and the country's northeastern region. ARR estimates revealed that the risk of hypertension among individuals with diabetes was 39% higher (95%CI:1.38-1.40) in men and 41% higher (95%CI:1.39-1.42) in women than in individuals without diabetes. Similarly, the risk of diabetes among individuals with hypertension was 51% higher (95%CI:1.49-1.52) in men and 55% higher (95%CI:1.53-1.57) in women than in individuals without hypertension.

conclusionOur findings highlight the progressive nature of the twin epidemics of diabetes and hypertension, with an increased risk of onset associated with advanced age. The presence of one condition substantially elevates the likelihood of developing the other, highlighting their bidirectional relationship. Achieving Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4 requires addressing these intersecting epidemics as a unified entity for effective management. Targeted interventions should prioritise high-burden hotspots for integrated care strategies to mitigate the twin epidemics of diabetes and hypertension.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusEpidemicsHypertensionAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSex DistributionSex FactorsAdjusted risk ratiosDiabetesEpidemiological transition levelsHotspotsHypertensionNon-communicable diseases (NCDs)Twin epidemics

Identifiers

PMID40349007
PMCPMC12065286

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.