Article in Plant physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Xuanwen YangNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3596-4112
Wenhua YangNational Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Jiacui LiCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0009-0001-1359-3509
Changwen ChenNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.ORCID 0009-0007-0863-5157
Siyu ChenNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.
Huan WangNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.
Jinlong WuNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-0106
Hui XueNational Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.ORCID 0009-0008-1662-7752
Yuting LiuNational Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7234-4570
Jianzhong LuNational Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Yiwen WangNational Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-9093
Mengrui DuNational Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8360-8218
Yong LiNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.ORCID 0009-0007-9940-1750
Weichao FangNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.ORCID 0009-0001-3037-798X
Ruirui LiuGansu Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Biological Resources and Ecological Restoration in Longdong, School of Agriculture and Bioengineering, Longdong University, Qingyang 745000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8690-5446
Yanling PengNational Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3172-3722
Qiang XuCollege of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1786-9696
Yongfeng ZhouNational Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Coconut Research Institute, Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0780-2973
Lirong WangNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4011-9527
Ke CaoNational Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Zhengzhou 450009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6961-3292
Funding
Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program CAAS-ASTIP-2020-ZFRI-01National Horticulture Germplasm Resources CenterNational Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding NKLTCB202402National Key Research and Development Program 2023YFE0105400National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaScience Fund Program for Distinguished Young Scholars
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Sugar content is a key determinant of peach (Prunus persica) fruit quality, influencing taste, consumer preferences, and market value. However, the roles of Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) transporters in sugar metabolism and regulation remain largely unexplored. This study employed a combination of spatial metabolomics, quantitative genetics, transcriptomics, comparative genomics, and functional genomics to investigate the role of 67 MFS members in balancing sugar metabolism during peach fruit development. Spatial metabolomics revealed dynamic sugar distribution patterns, with ERD6-like transporters (PpERDL16-1) and tonoplastic sugar transporters 1 (PpTST1) promoting sucrose accumulation and polyol/monosaccharide transporters 5 (PpPMT5-1) and sucrose transporters 4 (PpSUT4) reducing sucrose transport during fruit ripening. Functional studies confirmed these roles: PpERDL16-1 overexpression enhanced sucrose transport, and PpPMT5-1 or PpSUT4 silencing reduced sugar levels in peach fruit. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping identified a major locus on chromosome 5, upstream of PpTST1, forming distinct haplotypes (Hap1 and Hap2). Hap1 was associated with lower PpTST1 expression and higher sugar and soluble solids content (SSC), while Hap2 was linked to higher PpTST1 expression and lower sugar content. This inverse relationship suggests that upstream genetic variants fine-tune PpTST1 expression in a context-dependent manner, potentially through interactions with transcription factors or epigenetic modifiers. Notably, PpTST1 overexpression increased sugar content but did not alter SSC, indicating compensatory mechanisms such as changes in organic acid metabolism or water content. These results illuminate the molecular mechanisms regulating sugar homeostasis in peach fruits, providing valuable targets for the genetic improvement of fruit quality through breeding programs.
Indexed as
Carbohydrate MetabolismMembrane Transport ProteinsPlant ProteinsPrunus persicaSugarsFruitGene Expression Regulation, PlantQuantitative Trait LociSucroseMembrane Transport ProteinsPlant ProteinsSucroseSugars
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Major Facilitator Superfamily transporters balance sugar metabolism in peach. · full record | Socratic