ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Effect of Cerebrolysin on Cognitive Function and Delirium in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occurrence of delirium in the first days after cardiac surgery is associated with a worse prognosis. We studied the effect of cerebrolysin (CBL) given to patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) under extracorporeal circulation, on the postoperative results in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MoCA) results, and the rate of delirium detected by using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). MATERIAL AND METHODS Adult patients undergoing elective CABG surgery under propofol-based anesthesia were divided into 2 groups: the study group received 50 ml of CER preoperatively and on the 4 subsequent consecutive days, and the control group did not receive CER. MoCA was used to assess cognition, and CAM was applied to detect delirium. Both tests were performed preoperatively, as well as on the 2nd and 5th postoperative days. RESULTS The study [n=29] and control [n=26] groups were well-balanced in terms of basic demographic, psychological, and clinical variables. Although significantly lower values of the MoCA (medians: 27 vs 24, respectively; P=0.0083) were detected in the study group in the second assessment, the pre- and postoperative MoCA values did not differ between the analyzed groups. Delirium occurred in 3 cases, and only in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Patients maintained their cognitive status. The lack of delirium in the study group prompts us to develop a plan for a large-scale multicenter study assessing the potential ability of CER to reduce the risk of delirium in cardiac surgery patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.