ArticleMolecular nutrition & food research2025
Proteomic Profiling Informs Mechanisms of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Inhibition by Cranberry Proanthocyanidins.
Article in Molecular nutrition & food research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proanthocyanidins enhance antitumor immunity by promoting ubiquitin-proteasomal PD-L1 degradation via stabilization of LKB1 and SYVN1.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Proteomic Profiling Informs Mechanisms of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Inhibition by Cranberry Proanthocyanidins.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cranberry proanthocyanidins (CPACs) exert potent antiinflammatory and antibacterial activities in humans and anticancer effects in preclinical models, including those targeting esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This study applied proteomic profiling to investigate CPACs' inhibitory effects on reflux-induced EAC in a rat model. Tandem mass spectrometry was applied to protein isolated from water-, CPAC-, and reflux-exposed esophagi with and without CPAC treatment. Differentially expressed proteins were identified, followed by enrichment analyses to assess CPACs' capacity to ameliorate reflux-induced changes in gene set hallmarks, pathways, and process networks. CPAC directly reversed 42.1% of reflux-induced protein alterations. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed CPAC mitigated 11 hallmarks enriched in reflux-induced EAC (i.e., oxidative phosphorylation, myogenesis, adipogenesis, MYC targets, and P53). Top pathways over-represented with reflux and directly reversed by CPAC included spliceosome, metabolic pathways, and IL-17 signaling. Transcription_mRNA processing, translation_regulation/initiation, and inflammation (i.e., kallikrein-kinin system, neutrophil activation) dominated process networks upregulated by reflux and downregulated by CPAC. Networks exclusively altered by reflux and not mitigated by CPAC included ribosomal-linked translation, immune response_antigen presentation, and leptin signaling. Similarly, CPAC did not reverse the reflux-linked downregulation of ubiquinone metabolism. Identifying reflux-induced cancer processes and pathways that CPAC fails to mitigate may inform opportunities for combination prevention efforts moving forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.