ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting mortality risk in adult ICU patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving mortality prediction in critically ill cancer patients with a multidimensional machine learning model.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Advances in Imaging and Physiology-Guided Personalized Care in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in acute respiratory distress syndrome management: recent advances.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome triggered by pulmonary or extra-pulmonary factors with high mortality and poor prognosis in the ICU. The aim of this study was to develop an interpretable machine learning predictive model to predict the risk of death in patients with ARDS in the ICU. Methods: The datasets used in this study were obtained from two independent databases: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). This study used eight machine learning algorithms to construct predictive models. Recursive feature elimination with cross-validation is used to screen features, and cross-validation-based Bayesian optimization is used to filter the features used to find the optimal combination of hyperparameters for the model. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method is used to explain the decision-making process of the model. Results: A total of 5,732 patients with severe ADRS were included in this study for analysis, of which 1,171 patients (20.4%) did not survive. Among the eight models, XGBoost performed the best; AUC-ROC was 0.887 (95% CI: 0.863-0.909) and AUPRC was 0.731 (95% CI: 0.673-0.783). Conclusion: We developed a machine learning-based model for predicting the risk of death of critically ill ARDS patients in the ICU, and our model can effectively identify high-risk ARDS patients at an early stage, thereby supporting clinical decision-making, facilitating early intervention, and improving patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.