Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351669›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Surgical Methods and Devices for Atrial Fibrillation.

Yalu Yu, Qin Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yalu YuSchool of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 610054 Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5560-0777
Qin JiangSchool of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 610054 Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-359X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As technology advances, surgical approaches for atrial fibrillation have diversified. Surgical treatments include Cox-Maze surgery, left atrial appendage occlusion, or closure using a clip. Cox-Maze surgery removes excessive cardiac electrical conduction pathways, ensures electrical signals propagate exclusively through the predetermined maze channel and restores normal heart rhythm. Left atrial appendage closure reduces the risk of long-term disability or death caused by left atrial appendage thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. These devices are constantly being refined, including bipolar radiofrequency clamps (monopolar or bipolar radiofrequency), left atrial appendage closure devices (external excision using staplers, internal ligation with biomatrix patch occlusion, external device placement with the AtriClip and Endoloop ligature). In addition to surgical interventions, surgical biomaterial materials with biocompatibility and electrical conductivity have emerged in the basic research phase of atrial fibrillation treatment. This review delineates the primary surgical techniques, emphasizing their safety and efficacy in treating atrial fibrillation. An introduction to commonly used surgical equipment is provided as a reference for the clinical management of atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationCox-Mazeleft atrial appendage closuresurgical devices

Identifiers

PMID40351669
PMCPMC12059748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.