ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Age Differences in Aortic Stenosis.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovation and Challenges in Materials for Transcatheter Aortic Valves.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Challenges in diagnosis and management of severe aortic stenosis with coexisting cardiac amyloidosis: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Sex-Specific Differences in Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Individual Patient Survival Data.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- Long-term valve durability and clinical outcomes after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Colchicine therapy in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Modulating inflammation and outcomes.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- The influence of different transcatheter aortic valve implantation angles, as assessed by multidetector spiral CT scanning, on the depth of valve implantation and its impact on clinical prognosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Young Patients: Challenges and Perspectives-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation without on-site surgical backup: is it time for Poland to embrace the paradigm shift?Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a significant and growing concern, with a prevalence of 2-3% in individuals aged over 65 years. Moreover, with an aging global population, the prevalence is anticipated to double by 2050. Indeed, AS can arise from various etiologies, including calcific trileaflets, congenital valve abnormalities (e.g., bicuspid and unicuspid valves), and post-rheumatic, whereby each has a distinct influence that shapes the onset and progression of the disease. The normal aortic valve has a trilaminar structure comprising the fibrosa, spongiosa, and ventricularis, which work together to maintain its function. In calcific AS, the disease begins with early calcification starting in high mechanical stress areas of the valve and progresses slowly over decades, eventually leading to extensive calcification resulting in impaired valve function. This process involves mechanisms similar to atherosclerosis, including lipid deposition, chronic inflammation, and mineralization. The progression of calcific AS is strongly associated with aging, with additional risk factors including male gender, smoking, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome exacerbating the condition. Conversely, congenital forms of AS, such as bicuspid and unicuspid aortic valves, result in an earlier disease onset, typically 10-20 years earlier than that observed in patients with a normal tricuspid aortic valve. Rheumatic AS, although less common in developed countries due to effective antibiotic treatments, also exhibits age-related characteristics, with an earlier onset in individuals who experienced rheumatic fever in their youth. The only curative therapies currently available are surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, these options are sometimes too invasive for older patients; thus, management of AS, particularly in older patients, requires a comprehensive approach that considers age, disease severity, comorbidities, frailty, and each patient's individual needs. Although the valves used in TAVR demonstrate promising midterm durability, long-term data are still required, especially when used in younger individuals, usually with low surgical risk. Moreover, understanding the causes and mechanisms of structural valve deterioration is crucial for appropriate treatment selections, including valve selection and pharmacological therapy, since this knowledge is essential for optimizing the lifelong management of AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.