Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351962›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Decision-Making: Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Saudi Arabia.

Najlaa Alsudairy, Alaa Alahdal, Mona Alrashidi, Deemah Altashkandi, Sarah Alzaidi, Afnan Alghamdi, Saud Alzahrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Najlaa AlsudairyFamily Medicine, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Alaa AlahdalFamily Medicine, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Mona AlrashidiFamily Medicine, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Deemah AltashkandiFamily Medicine, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Sarah AlzaidiFamily Medicine, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Afnan AlghamdiFamily Medicine, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Saud AlzahraniFamily Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare, particularly in primary care, by improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. AI technologies, such as machine learning and natural language processing, can assist clinicians in diagnosing conditions, predicting outcomes, recommending treatments, and identifying at-risk individuals. Despite its potential, AI adoption in primary care is slow due to various challenges, including resource limitations, clinician training, and concerns about the reliability of AI systems. Understanding healthcare professionals' perceptions of AI is crucial for overcoming these barriers and promoting its integration into clinical practice.

methodsA cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted to assess healthcare professionals' awareness, usage, perceptions, and barriers to AI adoption in primary care decision-making in Saudi Arabia. The study included 250 healthcare professionals from primary care settings across urban, rural, and hospital-based clinics. Data were collected via an electronic survey that included both quantitative and qualitative questions, and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

resultsA total of 250 healthcare professionals participated in the survey. The majority were primary care physicians (44.8%), with the remaining participants consisting of nurses (27.2%), medical assistants (15.6%), and healthcare administrators (8.8%). Awareness of AI tools was mixed, with 14.8% of respondents very familiar with AI and 47.2% unfamiliar. Thirty-one percent of respondents reported using AI tools, primarily for diagnostic support (59.5%). Common barriers to AI adoption included high implementation costs (49.2%) and lack of training (34%). A significant portion of respondents (48%) expressed concerns about AI undermining the human touch in healthcare.

conclusionsAI adoption in primary care is hindered by low familiarity and usage, as well as several barriers, including cost, lack of training, and concerns about the reliability of AI systems. However, there is optimism about AI's potential to support clinical decision-making. Overcoming these barriers through targeted education, infrastructure investment, and further research is essential for promoting AI integration in primary care and realizing its potential benefits for clinical practice.

Indexed as

ai adoptionai toolsartificial intelligencebarriers to adoptionclinical decision-makingdecision-makingdiagnostic supporthealthcare professionalsprimary caretraining

Identifiers

PMID40351962
PMCPMC12063637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.