ArticleCureus2025
Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care Decision-Making: Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward integrating evidence-based practice and artificial intelligence in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Ethical Responsibility in Medical AI: A Semi-Systematic Thematic Review and Multilevel Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Attitudes, perceptions, and factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence Among healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia: a UTAUT-based study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Public Knowledge and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Perceptions and Attitudes of Emergency Physicians in Saudi Arabia Regarding Medical Use of Artificial Intelligence.Cureus · 2025Article
- The current status, knowledge, attitudes, and challenges of generative artificial intelligence use among undergraduate nursing students: a single-center cross-sectional survey of western China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare, particularly in primary care, by improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. AI technologies, such as machine learning and natural language processing, can assist clinicians in diagnosing conditions, predicting outcomes, recommending treatments, and identifying at-risk individuals. Despite its potential, AI adoption in primary care is slow due to various challenges, including resource limitations, clinician training, and concerns about the reliability of AI systems. Understanding healthcare professionals' perceptions of AI is crucial for overcoming these barriers and promoting its integration into clinical practice.
methodsA cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted to assess healthcare professionals' awareness, usage, perceptions, and barriers to AI adoption in primary care decision-making in Saudi Arabia. The study included 250 healthcare professionals from primary care settings across urban, rural, and hospital-based clinics. Data were collected via an electronic survey that included both quantitative and qualitative questions, and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
resultsA total of 250 healthcare professionals participated in the survey. The majority were primary care physicians (44.8%), with the remaining participants consisting of nurses (27.2%), medical assistants (15.6%), and healthcare administrators (8.8%). Awareness of AI tools was mixed, with 14.8% of respondents very familiar with AI and 47.2% unfamiliar. Thirty-one percent of respondents reported using AI tools, primarily for diagnostic support (59.5%). Common barriers to AI adoption included high implementation costs (49.2%) and lack of training (34%). A significant portion of respondents (48%) expressed concerns about AI undermining the human touch in healthcare.
conclusionsAI adoption in primary care is hindered by low familiarity and usage, as well as several barriers, including cost, lack of training, and concerns about the reliability of AI systems. However, there is optimism about AI's potential to support clinical decision-making. Overcoming these barriers through targeted education, infrastructure investment, and further research is essential for promoting AI integration in primary care and realizing its potential benefits for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.