ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Implementing a localized health promotion model in diabetic patients: a field trial.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Diabetes mellitus, a major cardiovascular risk factor, is a leading non-communicable disease globally. Self-management education can effectively prevent and control diabetes. We evaluated a localized health promotion model for diabetic patients through a field trial in a general hospital. Methods: We enrolled 452 diabetic patients who visited our hospital's cardiology and internal medicine wards and randomly assigned them to two equal groups: intervention and control. The intervention group received initial and periodic education on diabetes management and lifestyle modification, as well as educational materials. The control group received only initial education and phone follow-ups. We measured the following outcomes after 6 and 12 months of discharge: glucose and lipid levels, smoking status, diet quality, rehospitalization rate, treatment cost, quality of life, and work absenteeism. The groups were then compared using chi-square, student t-test, and two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: We enrolled 452 patients, randomized into two equal groups, and followed them for one year. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were similar between groups. The intervention group showed a significant reduction in BMI ( Conclusions: Health promotion interventions could improve glucose control and other health indicators and reduce costs for diabetic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.