ArticleCirculation reports2025
Population Gap for Chronic Heart Failure Patients Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Japan's Super-Aged Society.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Yiqi Fumai Lyophilized Injection for Improving Exercise Tolerance in Chronic Heart Failure: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models Incorporating Nursing Care Needs to Predict 180-Day Prognosis in Patients With Heart Failure: Validation With Discrimination and Calibration Analyses.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Association between resting heart rate and clinical outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: age stratified insights from the KUNIUMI Registry.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Annual Changes in the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Malnourished Patients With Heart Failure.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Circulation reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) management has been improved by guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) based on findings of major randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the applicability of these findings to real-world HF populations, especially Japan's current super-aged society, remains uncertain. Methods and Results: We analyzed findings for chronic HF patients from the KUNIUMI registry, a prospective observational study conducted on Awaji Island, Japan, representative of a super-aged society (aging rate ≈37%). We determined what percentage of these patients met the inclusion criteria as well as the exclusion criteria of 6 major representative RCTs (PARADIGM-HF, PARAGON-HF, DAPA-HF, DELIVER, EMPEROR-Reduced, EMPEROR-Preserved) and compared the incidence of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization over 3 years for patients who did and did not meet the exclusion criteria. Of the 1,646 patients from the KUNIUMI registry, 225 were eligible for PARADIGM-HF, DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced, 554 for PARAGON-HF, and 631 for DELIVER and EMPEROR-Preserved. The exclusion percentages for the overall eligible population were 48.4% (PARADIGM-HF), 36.4% (DAPA-HF), 42.7% (EMPEROR-Reduced), 57.9% (PARAGON-HF), 32.3% (DELIVER), and 31.4% (EMPEROR-Preserved). It should be noted that ineligible patients had a poorer prognosis than eligible patients (P<0.05 for each trial). Conclusions: The population gap between HF patients in major RCTs and the current super-aged society underscores the need for further evidence of GDMT in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.