ArticleNarra J2025
Chinese generative AI models (DeepSeek and Qwen) rival ChatGPT-4 in ophthalmology queries with excellent performance in Arabic and English.
Article in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models for analyzing contrast-enhanced ultrasound reports of pancreatic cystic lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- From adoption to interaction: examining human-GenAI engagement patterns, ethical tensions, and educational trade-offs in nursing education.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Applications of DeepSeek in Medicine: Bibliometric Analysis and Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Arabic-Language AI Chatbot Responses to Migraine-Related Questions: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of five large language models in oral and maxillofacial surgery exam questions: a comparative study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Clinical Competence of Large Language Models in Prostate Cancer Management: A Comparative Study of DeepSeek-R1 and ChatGPT.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Evolving Consultation: Enhancing Ophthalmic Diagnostic Performance Using Large Language Model.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Dermatology "AI Babylon": Cross-Language Evaluation of AI-Crafted Dermatology Descriptions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Automated Tumor and Node Staging from Esophageal Cancer Endoscopic Ultrasound Reports: A Benchmark of Advanced Reasoning Models with Prompt Engineering and Cross-Lingual Evaluation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond accuracy: evaluating the reliability of large language models for medical assessment.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Construction and evaluation of the knowledge graph and large model question-answering system for Jin San Zhen therapy: a tool study for primary care and general practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Complementary AI in higher education: behavioral, cognitive, and ethical implications of ChatGPT and DeepSeek.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Comparison of ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek R1 in the Management of Ophthalmological Emergencies-An Analysis of Ten Fictional Case Vignettes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Benchmark analysis of myopia-related issues using large language models: a comparison of ChatGPT-4o and deepseek.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) has ushered in a new era of digital medical consultations, with patients turning to AI-driven tools for guidance. The emergence of Chinese-developed genAI models such as DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen-2.5 presented a challenge to the dominance of OpenAI's ChatGPT. The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of Chinese genAI models against ChatGPT-40 and to assess disparities in performance across English and Arabic. Following the METRICS checklist for genAI evaluation, Qwen-2.5, DeepSeek-R1, and ChatGPT-40 were assessed for completeness, accuracy, and relevance using the CLEAR tool in common patient ophthalmology queries. In English, Qwen-2.5 demonstrated the highest overall performance (CLEAR score: 4.43 ± 0.28), outperforming both DeepSeek-R1 (4.3 ± 0.43) and ChatGPT-40 (4.14 ± 0.41), with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.