Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352192›Full record

ArticleNarra J2025

Comprehensive investigation of

Preeyaporn M Sreepian, Supaluk Popruk, Panthip Rattanasinganchan, Apichai Sreepian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Preeyaporn M SreepianFaculty of Medical Technology, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Supaluk PoprukDepartment of Protozoology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Panthip RattanasinganchanFaculty of Medical Technology, Huachiew Chalermprakiet University, Samut Prakan, Thailand.
Apichai SreepianFaculty of Medical Technology, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The escalating global incidence of antimicrobial resistance poses a significant public health challenge. In response, exploring alternative antimicrobial agents, particularly derived from plants, becomes crucial to alleviate the selective pressure exerted by conventional antibiotics. The aim of this study was to characterize the composition of essential oil extracted from

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsFungiLitseaOils, VolatileGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsOils, VolatileAntibacterial activityantifungal activityessential oillimoneneLitsea cubeba

Identifiers

PMID40352192
PMCPMC12059852

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.