ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Evaluating diversity and stereotypes amongst AI generated representations of healthcare providers.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Limitations of Artificial Intelligence Generated Images for Hand Surgery Patient Education.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
- Human asymmetries in AI art: Syntax and writing direction effects on agent position in AI-generated images.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) can simulate existing societal data, which led us to explore diversity and stereotypes among AI-generated representations of healthcare providers. Methods: We used DALL-E 3, a text-to-image generator, to generate 360 images from healthcare profession terms tagged with specific race and sex identifiers. These images were evaluated for sex and race diversity using consensus scoring. To explore stereotypes present in the images, we employed Google Vision to label objects, actions, and backgrounds in the images. Results: We found modest levels of sex diversity (3.2) and race diversity (2.8) on a 5-point scale, where 5 indicates maximum diversity. These findings align with existing workforce statistics, suggesting that Generative AI reflects real-world diversity patterns. The analysis of Google Vision image labels revealed sex and race-linked stereotypes related to appearance, facial expressions, and attire. Discussion: This study is the first of its kind to provide a ML-based framework for quantifying diversity and biases amongst generated AI images of healthcare providers. These insights can guide policy decisions involving the use of Generative AI in healthcare workforce training and recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.