Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352401›Full record

ReviewOpen access journal of contraception2025

PCOS and Obesity: Contraception Challenges.

Blazej Meczekalski, Melissa Rasi, Christian Battipaglia, Tiziana Fidecicchi, Gregory Bala, Anna Szeliga, Stefano Luisi, Alessandro D Genazzani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open access journal of contraception, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Blazej MeczekalskiDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Greater Poland, Poland.
Melissa RasiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-3332-0530
Christian BattipagliaGynecological Endocrinology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-1563-7598
Tiziana FidecicchiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gregory BalaUCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Anna SzeligaDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Greater Poland, Poland.
Stefano LuisiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro D GenazzaniGynecological Endocrinology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most prevalent endocrine disorders affecting women of reproductive age, with an estimated prevalence of 5-10%. Women with PCOS are at increased risk for metabolic disturbances. A significant proportion of women with PCOS, ranging from 40 to 85%, are either overweight or obese. Oral contraception is the standard first line treatment for PCOS. However, certain conditions associated with PCOS, such as obesity, must be considered when deciding to prescribe combined oral contraception. It seems that there is no clinical advantage in using high-dose ethinyl estradiol over low-dose formulations. Lower-dose EE formulations may be considered a safer option for obese PCOS patients. Combined oral contraception containing natural estrogens, which have a beneficial effect on metabolic parameters, could also be a viable option for this group. Progestin-only (POPs) formulations have minimal metabolic effects, making them a safe contraceptive choice for patients with obesity and a high risk of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, venous thromboembolism, or hypertension. Non-oral contraceptive methods, such as transdermal patches and vaginal rings, offer a valuable alternative for women with PCOS who prefer not to use daily oral contraceptives. However, the absence of anti-androgenic progestins in these contraceptive methods may limit their effectiveness, especially for women with moderate to severe clinical signs of androgen excess. The use of LNG-IUDs in women with PCOS may be beneficial in several ways. First, in cases where other contraceptive methods are contraindicated, the LNG-IUD provides effective contraception while also regulating abnormal uterine bleeding. Additionally, the relative hyperestrogenism associated with anovulation in PCOS can lead to endometrial hyperplasia with atypia and, in severe cases, endometrial cancer. Therefore, in women with both PCOS and obesity, the LNG-IUD may be preferred over oral megestrol acetate for endometrial protection.

Indexed as

IUDobesityoral contraceptionPCOSpolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40352401
PMCPMC12063626

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.