Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352592›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

A machine-learning approach for pancreatic neoplasia classification based on plasma extracellular vesicles.

Ioanna Angelioudaki, Angeliki Iosif, Konstadina Kourou, Alexandros-Georgios Tzingounis, Vassiliki Kigka, Androniki-Maria Skreka, Myrto Costopoulos, Nikolaos Memos, Agapi Kataki, Manousos M Konstadoulakis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ioanna Angelioudaki *2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Angeliki Iosif *Unit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina and Biomedical Research Institute, Foundation for Research & Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Ioannina, Greece.
Konstadina KourouUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina and Biomedical Research Institute, Foundation for Research & Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Ioannina, Greece.
Alexandros-Georgios Tzingounis2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Vassiliki KigkaUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina and Biomedical Research Institute, Foundation for Research & Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Ioannina, Greece.
Androniki-Maria Skreka2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Myrto CostopoulosFlow Cytometry Department, BioAnalytica SA, Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos Memos1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Hippokratio" General Hospital, Medical School of Athens National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Agapi Kataki1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Hippokratio" General Hospital, Medical School of Athens National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Manousos M Konstadoulakis2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios I FotiadisUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina and Biomedical Research Institute, Foundation for Research & Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a lethal disease developing from either exocrine or endocrine cells. Efforts to assist early diagnosis focus on liquid biopsy methods, and especially on the detection of Extracellular Vesicles (EVs) secreted from cancer cells in their microenvironment and accumulated in systemic circulation. Multiple studies explore how EVs size, surface biomarkers or content can determine their unique role and function in the recipient cell's gene expression, metabolism and behavior affecting cancer development. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-driven (ML) pipeline utilizing clinical variables and EV-based features to predict the presence of pancreatic tumors of different nature (exocrine/endocrine) in patients' plasma compared to patients with benign lesions or age-matched non-oncological patients. Methods: All available plasma samples (N=126) and variables were collected prior to surgery. EVs were detected and characterized by flow cytometry-immunostaining. Data including size and a unique set of biomarkers (CD45, CD63 and EphA2) were combined with hematological/biochemical data and processed under two use cases, each formulated as a 3-class classification problem for patient risk stratification. The first use case aimed at classifying patients as with benign lesions or exocrine/endocrine neoplasms. The second use case aimed to distinguish patients with exocrine/endocrine neoplasms from non-oncological patients. Various ML methods were applied, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. Evaluation metrics, as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), were computed, and Shapley values were utilized to determine features with the greatest impact on the discrimination of outcome groups. Results: Analyses identified hematological and biochemical features, among significant predictors. Models demonstrated substantial accuracy and AUC-ROC values based on plasma EVs subpopulations, which scored over 0.90 in accuracy of the Random Forest and XGBoost algorithms, presenting 0.96 +/- 0.03 accuracy in the first use case and 0.93 +/- 0.04 in the second. Discussion: By leveraging advanced analytical ML-driven approaches and integrating diverse data types, this study achieved significant accuracy, assisting patient's risk estimation and supporting the feasibility for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Going beyond currently used biomarkers such as CEA, or CA19.9, EV-based features represent an added value offering increased diagnostic capacity.

Indexed as

extracellular vesiclesflow cytometryliquid biopsymachine learningneuroendocrine neoplasmspancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID40352592
PMCPMC12061713

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.