ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2025
The Causal Association Analysis between Depression and Cerebrospinal Fluid: From the Perspective of Mendelian Randomization.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum metabolites associated with depression and anxiety in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.Translational psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Cell-Type-Specific WTAP and ALKBH5-Mediated mCNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Serum Metabolites Associated with Depression and Anxiety in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) leads to significant distress and disruption across social, occupational, and other functional domains. Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have been identified as potential indicators and therapeutic targets for depression, their causal relationship with MDD remains unclear. Methods: We analyzed publicly available CSF metabolomics and genotype data, quantifying 338 distinct metabolites. Among these, 296 were chemically validated and classified into eight major metabolic groups, while 38 remained undefined. To assess the genetic association with depression, we used summary statistics from a GWAS (F5_DEPRESSIO dataset, including 53,313 diagnosed cases and 394,756 controls from Finland). An integrated approach combining Mendelian randomization (MR), inverse variance weighting (IVW), and linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) was applied to explore the causal impact of CSF metabolites on depression risk. Results: Our analysis identified 62 metabolites significantly associated with depression (p < 0.05). Sensitivity tests revealed heterogeneity in five metabolites: 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, X-19438, ethylmalonic acid, γ-glutamylglutamine, and β-alanine. A focused analysis on 14 metabolites further supported a potential causal link with depression. LDSC confirmed significant genetic heritability for metabolites such as creatinine, arginine succinate, N-acetylisourea, 3-amino-2-piperidone, and carboxyethyl-GABA. Systematic leave-one-out analyses demonstrated that these associations are driven by multiple interacting SNPs rather than a single variant. Conclusion: This study provides novel insights into the potential causal relationship between CSF metabolites and depression, highlighting 14 key metabolites with significant associations. The robustness of these findings is supported by MR and sensitivity analyses. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to confirm the clinical relevance of these CSF biomarkers in MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.