ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
A novel predictive method for URS and laser lithotripsy using machine learning and explainable AI: results from the FLEXOR international database.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The future of endourology is now.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Development of a calibrated logistic regression clinical risk score for predicting postoperative sepsis following retrograde intrarenal surgery.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Prediction model for additional procedure requirement in flexible ureterorenoscopy using explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of ureteroscopy in children with lower pole renal stones : a machine learning predictive model from the EAU section of endourology.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Zero residual fragment ureteroscopy: from possibility to reality - an EAU endourology perspective.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe developed Machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict ureteroscopy (URS) outcomes, offering insights into diagnosis and treatment planning, personalised care and improved clinical decision-making.
methodsFLEXOR is a large international multicentric database including 6669 patients treated with URS for urolithiasis from 2015 to 2023. Preoperative and postoperative(PO) correlations were investigated through 15 ML-trained algorithms. Outcomes included stone free status (SFS, at 3-month imaging follow up), intraoperative (PCS bleeding, ureteric/PCS injury, need for postoperative drainage) and PO complications (fever, sepsis, need for reintervention). ML was applied for the prediction, correlation and logistic regression analysis. Explainable AI emphasizes key features and their contributions to the output.
resultsExtra Tree Classifier achieved the best accuracy (81%) in predicting SFS. PCS bleed was negatively linked with 'positive urine culture'(-0.08), 'tamsulosin'(-0.08), 'stone location'(-0.10), 'fibre optic scope'(-0.19), 'Moses Fibre'(-0.09), and 'TFL'(-0.09), and positively with 'elevated creatine'(0.25), 'fever'(0.11), and 'stone diameter'(0.21). 'PCS injury' and 'ureteric injury' both showed moderate correlation with 'elevated creatinine'(0.11), 'fever'(0.10), and 'lower pole stone'(0.09). 'Tamsulosin'(0.23) use, presence of 'multiple'(0.25) or 'lower pole'(0.25) stones, 'reusable scope'(0.17) and 'Moses Fibre'(0.2546) increased the risk for PO stent, while 'digital scope'(-0.13) or 'TFL'(-0.29) reduced it. 'Preoperative fever'(0.10), 'positive urine culture'(0.16), and 'stone diameter'(0.10) may play a role in 'PO fever' and 'sepsis'. SFS was mainly influenced by 'age'(0.12), 'preoperative fever'(0.09), 'multiple stones'(0.15), 'stone diameter'(0.17), 'Moses Fibre"(0.15) and 'TFL'(-0.28).
conclusionML is valuable tool for accurately predicting outcomes by analysing pre-existing datasets. Our model demonstrated strong performance in outcomes and risks prediction, laying the groundwork for development of accessible predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.