ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Multi-centric AI Model for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Detection and Volumetric Segmentation in 3D TOF-MRI.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop an open-source nnU-Net-based AI model for combined detection and segmentation of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UICA) in 3D TOF-MRI and compare models trained on datasets with aneurysm-like differential diagnoses. This retrospective study (2020-2023) included 385 anonymized 3D TOF-MRI images from 345 patients (mean age 59 years, 60% female) at multiple centers plus 113 subjects from the ADAM challenge. Images featured untreated or possible UICA and differential diagnoses. Four distinct training datasets were created, and the nnU-Net framework was used for model development. Performance was assessed on a separate test set using sensitivity and false positive (FP)/case rate for detection and DICE score and NSD (normalized surface distance, 0.5 mm threshold) for segmentation. Segmentation performance on the test set was also compared to a second human reader. The four models achieved overall sensitivity between 82 and 85% and an FP/case rate of 0.20 to 0.31, with no significant differences (p = 0.90 and p = 0.16) between them. The primary model showed 85% sensitivity and 0.23 FP/case rate, outperforming the ADAM-challenge winner (61%) and a nnU-Net trained on ADAM data (51%) in sensitivity (p < 0.05). Mean DICE (0.73) and NSD (0.84 for 0.5 mm threshold) for correctly detected UICA did not significantly differ from human reader performance. Our open-source, nnU-Net-based AI model (available at https://zenodo.org/records/13386859 ) demonstrates high sensitivity, low FP rates, and consistent segmentation accuracy for UICA detection and segmentation in 3D TOF-MRI, suggesting its potential to improve clinical diagnosis and monitoring of UICA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.