ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2025
Genetic Landscape and Risk Stratification of AML With Hyperdiploid Karyotype.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperdiploid karyotype (HK) (49-65 chromosomes) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is rare. Recently, HK-AML with only numerical changes has been reclassified into an intermediate risk group in the updated 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classification, which has historically been classified into an adverse risk group. However, there are limited data in the literature concerning whether these new exclusion criteria are appropriate, and the genetic landscape of HK-AML remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of HK-AML diagnosed at our institution. Among 124 cases, 72 (58.1%) had concurrent adverse risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HK-ADV), 33 (26.6%) had other concurrent structural abnormalities (HK-STR) and 19 (15.3%) had numerical changes alone (HK-NUM). The most frequently gained chromosomes were chromosomes 8, 22, 21, and 19. TP53 mutation was associated with HK-ADV, and a higher frequency of mutations in DNA methylation genes was present in HK-NUM and HK-STR. Patients with HK-NUM had significantly longer overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) compared to those with HK-ADV. In the adjusted model accounting for confounders, the HK-STR outcome was superior to that of HK-ADV but was not significantly different from that of HK-NUM. In addition, patients with a modal chromosome number of 49-53 had more favorable survival than those with ≥ 54 chromosomes. Our data support the reclassification of HK-NUM patients in the intermediate risk group and suggest that HK-STR might also be more appropriately classified into the intermediate risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.