SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Incidence of infection associated with eculizumab: a meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Humoral rejection in heart transplantation in the current era.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Drug-induced adverse events in modern pharmacotherapy: mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and implications for risk assessment and management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Complement C5 inhibition in generalized myasthenia gravis is associated with improved survival and increased cardiovascular risk.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Viral infections and related fatal adverse events associated with complement inhibitors for PNH: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis in FAERS.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Eculizumab is expected to lead to increased susceptibility to infection. We performed a meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the risk of infection in eculizumab-treated patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov (up to 8 Oct 2024) to identify published RCTs that focused on the occurrence of infection in patients treated with eculizumab regardless of the indications of the patients. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated via the random effects model. (PROSPERO Code No. CRD42024562470). Results: Nine RCTs including 691 patients were eligible. Compared with the control (placebo or standard of care), eculizumab did not significantly increase the overall risk of infection (RR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.89-1.28; Conclusion: Compared with placebo or standard of care, although eculizumab did not significantly increase the overall risk of infection, it was associated with 33% and 131% increases in the risk of general urinary system infection and severe bacteremia, respectively. Systematic Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024562470.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.