ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Joint and independent associations of dietary vitamin intake and prevalence of cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease subjects: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonlinear associations between serum vitamin mixtures and cardiovascular disease risk: insights from a national cross-sectional analysis.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Commentary: Joint and independent associations of dietary vitamin intake and prevalence of cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease subjects: a cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Currently, the joint and independent effects of intake of multiple dietary vitamins (including vitamin A, B1, B2, B6, B12, C, D, E, and K) on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population are unclear, so this study was conducted to investigate mainly this point. Methods: We collected National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2011 to 2016. We performed weighted multivariate logistic regression models to analyze the association of single dietary vitamins intake with CVD. Additionally, we examined the co-exposure of nine dietary vitamins, defined as their concurrent intake, and evaluated the potential additive or interactive effects of co-exposure of nine dietary vitamins on CVD risk in CKD patients using Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) and weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression. Results: Finally, 2,203 CKD participants (weighted Conclusion: High intakes of vitamin B6 and vitamin E were associated with low CVD risk in CKD patients, respectively. Additionally, nine dietary vitamins (vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, B12, C, D, E, and K) co-exposure were inversely correlated with the CVD prevalence in the CKD populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.