Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40357245›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Development and evaluation of the Flourish Diabetes Programme.

Sylvia Kruger, Elmari Deacon, Esme van Rensburg, David Segal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sylvia KrugerDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Community Psychological Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-3853
Elmari DeaconDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Optentia Research Unit, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1914-4157
Esme van RensburgDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Community Psychological Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5961-4416
David SegalDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Optentia Research Unit, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3804-516X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes face unique challenges in adapting to closed-loop technology. Positive psychology interventions may aid in promoting psychological adjustment, enhancing well-being and supporting the effective use of this technology. Aim: This study describes the development, content and evaluation of a positive psychology intervention, the Flourish Diabetes Programme, to facilitate adjustment to closed-loop technology among adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Setting: The Flourish Diabetes Programme is an online, interactive intervention aimed at adolescents living with type 1 diabetes who use closed-loop technology. Methods: The development of the programme was informed by qualitative research with adolescents, qualitative document analysis and the design and development model. The Delphi method was used to evaluate the intervention, where 11 experts provided feedback to refine and enhance the programme. Results: Feedback from the Delphi panel informed the refinement and finalisation of the Flourish Diabetes Programme, contributing to an evidence-based and user-centred intervention. Conclusion: The Flourish Diabetes Programme is a tailored online resource designed to support adolescents in adapting to closed-loop technology. Insights from the Delphi panel helped shape the programme into a practical tool for promoting positive adjustment. Contribution: This intervention is the first step in developing effective, evidence-based resources to help adolescents with type 1 diabetes manage new medical technologies, specifically closed-loop systems, using positive psychological principles.

Indexed as

adjustment to closed-loop technologyclosed-loop technologyDelphi methodinterventionpositive psychologytype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40357245
PMCPMC12067628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.