ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
An optimized deep learning model based on transperineal ultrasound images for precision diagnosis of female stress urinary incontinence.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transperineal Ultrasound Measurement of Retrovesical Angle at Rest for Assessing Severity of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is widely utilized for the evaluation of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, the diagnostic accuracy of parameters related to urethral mobility and morphology remains limited and requires further optimization. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate an optimized deep learning (DL) model based on TPUS images to improve the precision and reliability of female SUI diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed TPUS images from 464 women, including 200 patients with SUI and 264 controls, collected between 2020 and 2024. Three DL models (ResNet-50, ResNet-152, and DenseNet-121) were trained on resting-state and Valsalva-state images using an 8:2 training-to-testing split. Model performance was assessed using diagnostic metrics, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A TPUS-index model, constructed using measurement parameters assessing urethral mobility, was used for comparison. Finally, the best-performing DL model was selected to evaluate its diagnostic advantages over traditional methods. Results: Among the three developed DL models, DenseNet-121 demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance, achieving an AUC of 0.869, an accuracy of 0.87, a sensitivity of 0.872, a specificity of 0.761, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.788, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.853. When compared to the TPUS-index model, the DenseNet-121 model exhibited significantly superior diagnostic performance in both the training set ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of DL models, particularly DenseNet-121, to enhance the diagnosis of female SUI using TPUS images, providing a reliable and consistent diagnostic tool for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.