ReviewCardiology journal2025
Targeting factor XI as a compromise between thrombosis and bleeding.
Review in Cardiology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thromboembolic diseases have long been a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, necessitating advances in anticoagulant drugs. Heparins, vitamin K inhibitors, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are well-established drug classes that help prevent thromboembolic complications. While effective, they pose significant risks during long-term therapy, including bleeding, osteoporosis, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and the need for frequent monitoring and dose adjustments. Factor XI (FXI) inhibitors represent an innovative approach in anticoagulation therapy, aiming to balance thromboembolic events with the risk of bleeding complications. They include: a) orally administered small molecule inhibitors such as milvexian and asundexian; b) monoclonal antibodies such as abelacimab, osocimab, and xisomab, which specifically bind and inactivate FXI; c) FXI-antisense oligonucleotide (FXI-ASO), which downregulate FXI synthesis at the mRNA level and reduce plasma FXI concentrations. Available data indicate that FXI inhibitors decrease the risk of thromboembolic events and are associated with a lower incidence of major bleeding than current gold standard methods. Hence, FXI inhibitors may become the preferred anticoagulant class, especially for patients with elevated bleeding risk. Their development is an important step in the history of anticoagulant therapy, striving to find a balance between preventing thromboembolism and reducing bleeding risk, ultimately improving patient outcomes. In this context, a discussion on the characteristics of FXI inhibitors, a summary on data regarding the efficacy and safety of FXI inhibitors based on preclinical and clinical studies, and an outline of future perspectives regarding therapeutic strategies of FXI inhibition in venous thrombosis are presented in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.