Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358709›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025

Fathoming the scientific paradox of intangibles: protocol reappraisal for optimizing cognitive outcomes in faciocraniosynostosis-an institutional experience.

Suhas Udayakumaran, Shibani Nerurkar, Vinanthi P V, Arjun Krishnadas, Pramod Subash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suhas UdayakumaranDivision of Paediatric Neurosurgery and Craniofacial Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi-41, Kochi, Kerala, India. dr.suhas@gmail.com.
Shibani NerurkarDepartment of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi-41, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Vinanthi P VDepartment of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi-41, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Arjun KrishnadasDepartment of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi-41, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Pramod SubashDepartment of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi-41, Kochi, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe critical nature of normal intracranial pressure (ICP) and proper airway function in early brain development, particularly in the first 5 years, are well established. These elements are compromised in faciocraniosynostoses and potentially affect neurological growth. The impact of variations in ICP and airway on cognitive development remains underappreciated and challenging to quantify.

objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a comprehensive early surgical intervention institutional protocol in children (0-5 years) with syndromic faciocraniosynostosis.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed our comprehensive surgical protocol in children who consecutively underwent cranial vault and midface procedures for syndromic craniosynostosis between July 2015 and January 2024, focusing on those who underwent both calvarial and midface surgeries before the age of 5 years. SURGICAL PROTOCOL: Our treatment algorithm prioritized posterior calvarial distraction (PCVD) as the initial intervention for children with faciocraniosynostoses. Frontal orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is preferred to address aesthetic concerns and ICP in older children. Midface distraction was performed for clinically significant airway compromise.

resultsThe cohort included 31 children with a mean age of 18.8 months at the initial surgery. The primary procedures included PCVD (n = 16), robotic-assisted frontofacial advancement (RAFFA) (n = 5), robotic-assisted midface distraction (RAMD) (n = 6), and FOAR (n = 4). The second procedure (n = 25) included RAFFA (n = 5), RAMD (n = 13), and FOAR (n = 7). The third procedure (n = 11) included RAMD (n = 1), FOAR (n = 9), and repeat PCVD (n = 1). The mean age of the patients at the final surgery was 57.5 months.

conclusionThis comprehensive strategy addresses both cranial and midface issues and the challenge of optimizing cognitive development within the critical developmental window.

Indexed as

CognitionCraniofacial DysostosisCraniosynostosesPlastic Surgery ProceduresChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntracranial PressureMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAlgorithmComprehensive managementEarly interventionFunctionalOutcomePosterior cranial vault distractionSyndromic craniosynostoses

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.