Evidence mapPaperPMID 40358737Full record

SynthesisCurrent diabetes reports2025

Financial Toxicity in Diabetes: The State of What We Know.

Minal R Patel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current diabetes reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Unveiling the Antihyperglycemic Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Family member involvement when multiple family members have type 1 diabetes.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Minal R PatelDepartment of Health Behavior & Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, SPH 1, Room 3810, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA. minalrp@umich.edu.

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK092926 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2025 to 2025
$779k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis systematic examination quantifies financial toxicity- the economic burden and related financial distress experienced by patients due to medical costs- in diabetes management globally, analyzing prevalence, mechanisms, and interventions across diverse healthcare systems and geographic contexts. RECENT

findingsData indicates 30-60% of diabetes patients experience financial toxicity, with household expenditures ranging from 5 to 40% of income on disease management, and demographic disparities evident. Current intervention strategies demonstrate limited efficacy, particularly in resource-constrained settings, while policy approaches show mixed results across economic contexts. Financial toxicity operates through four identified pathways: direct expenses, indirect costs (productivity/caregiver burden), insurance coverage limitations, and structural access barriers. Research priorities include developing validated measurement instruments for diabetes financial toxicity, implementing contextually appropriate interventions, and establishing causative relationships between financial burden and clinical outcomes through longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessDiabetes MellitusFinancial StressHealth ExpendituresHumansDiabetesEconomic burdenFinancial burdenFinancial stressFinancial toxicity

Identifiers

PMID40358737
PMCPMC12075023

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.