SynthesisPloS one2025
Therapeutic potential of anti-thymocyte globulin in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune condition characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) has emerged as a promising immunomodulatory therapy aimed at preserving beta-cell function and altering the disease course. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence from the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of low-dose ATG in individuals with T1D.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Science Direct, Scopus, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov, to identify studies investigating ATG in T1D in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools for randomized clinical trials and case-control studies were used to assess the quality and evaluate the risk of bias in the eligible studies.
resultsThe primary outcomes assessed were preservation of C-peptide levels, glycemic control, and adverse events. Results indicated that ATG showed potential in preserving beta-cell function and improving clinical outcomes in recent-onset T1D. However, the incidence of adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome and lymphopenia, necessitated careful monitoring and management.
conclusionLow-dose ATG presents a promising therapeutic approach for modifying the progression of T1D. While early-phase trials demonstrate potential benefits in preserving beta-cell function, further large-scale, long-term studies are essential to establish optimal dosing regimens, long-term efficacy, and safety profiles. This review highlights the importance of continued research to fully elucidate the role of ATG in T1D management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.