Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40359708›Full record

Trial reportESMO open2025

A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of telaglenastat (CB-839) in combination with nivolumab in patients with metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer.

M A Gouda, M H Voss, H Tawbi, M Gordon, S S Tykodi, E T Lam, U Vaishampayan, N M Tannir, J Chaves, P Nikolinakos and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

M A GoudaThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
M H VossMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
H TawbiThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
M GordonPinnacle Oncology Hematology, Scottsdale, USA.
S S TykodiUniversity of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA.
E T LamUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
U VaishampayanKarmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, USA.
N M TannirThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
J ChavesNorthwest Medical Specialties, Tacoma, USA.
P NikolinakosUniversity Cancer & Blood Center, Athens, USA.
A FanStanford University Medical Center, Stanford, USA.
R LeeMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
D McDermottBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.
G I ShapiroDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
L GandhiNYU Medical Oncology Associates, New York, USA.
S BhatiaUniversity of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA.
V KatragaddaCornerstone Pharmaceuticals Inc., East Windsor Township, USA.
F Meric-BernstamThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. Electronic address: fmeric@mdanderson.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI FRANCESCA M GANY · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelaglenastat (CB-839) is a glutaminase 1 inhibitor that targets the dysregulation in glutamine metabolism in cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Preclinical data suggested that the combination of telaglenastat with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies can lead to enhanced immune response against cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe designed a phase I/II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of telaglenastat combined with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Dose escalation was carried out using a 3 + 3 design with two dose levels for telaglenastat (600 mg and 800 mg twice daily). Nivolumab was given at a fixed dose of 240 mg by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle in all patients. Expansion in phase II was planned using Simon's two-stage design in disease- and prior therapy-specific cohorts.

resultsWe included a total of 118 patients across different cohorts. The most frequently reported adverse events were fatigue (42.4%; n = 50), nausea (39%; n = 46), and photophobia (32.2%; n = 38). In the response-assessable analysis set (including 107 patients in dose expansion and recommended phase II dose of dose escalation), the overall response rate (ORR) was 8.4% (n = 9). The ORR was 24% in 25 patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) who were checkpoint inhibitor-naïve, 5.9% in 17 patients with ccRCC after nivolumab, 0% in 9 patients with ccRCC after other prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1, 5.4% in 37 patients with melanoma after anti-PD-1/PD-L1, and 0% in 19 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after anti-PD-1/PD-L1.

conclusionsTelaglenastat in combination with nivolumab was generally well tolerated. The combination did not show a pattern of efficacy across different study cohorts.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMelanomaNivolumabAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeNivolumabCB-839clinical trialsglutaminase inhibitornivolumab

Identifiers

PMID40359708
PMCPMC12141888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.