SynthesisEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Effect of pulmonary artery pressure-guided management on outcomes of patients with heart failure outside clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence with the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System.
Synthesis in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart failure evidence update 2026.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Heart failure hospitalization reduction and long-term safety with remote pulmonary artery pressure monitoring: results of the CardioMEMS heart failure system outside United States (of America) post-market study.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Digital Medicine in the Management of Heart Failure: From Reactive Care to Predictive, Pathophysiology-Driven Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Challenges of Vascular Implants: Regulatory Strategies and Biological Responses.Small science · 2025Review
- Remote Hemodynamic Monitoring in Heart Failure Management: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances and Clinical Challenges.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPulmonary artery pressure (PAP)-guided heart failure (HF) management using the CardioMEMS HF System improves patient outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our aim was to systematically assess its impact on outcomes of HF patients receiving the device in a non-RCT setting. METHODS AND
resultsPubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Clinical Trial Collection were searched on 8 January 2025. Studies were eligible if they included: (i) pre/post-comparison of outcomes in patients receiving CardioMEMS; (ii) adult patients diagnosed with HF; (iii) follow-up ≥6 months, and (iv) report of the primary outcome, i.e. HF hospitalization (HFH) rates. Other outcomes were changes in PAP, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and quality of life. Quantitative analysis was performed by generating forest plots and calculating pooled means, mean differences and incidence rate ratio (IRR) by random-effect models, as appropriate. Eight studies with a total of 3306 patients were included. Four studies were single-arm, open-label, industry-funded studies and four real-world practice studies. Four studies were performed in the US and four in Europe. Significant decreases in systolic PAP (-7.8 mmHg [-10.1 mmHg; -5.6 mmHg]), mean PAP (-5.2 mmHg [-6.7 mmHg; -3.8 mmHg]) and diastolic PAP (-4.4 mmHg [-5.5 mmHg; -3.3 mmHg]) were demonstrated. One year after CardioMEMS implantation, 56% [43%; 67%] of patients were NYHA class I/II with EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale scores being significantly improved from baseline (7.2 [3.5; 10.9]). PAP-guided HF management was associated with a significant, 61% decrease in HFHs at 1 year (IRR 0.39 [0.31; 0.47]).
conclusionsHeart failure management with CardioMEMS leads to lower PAP, improved functional status and quality of life, and decrease of HFHs at 1 year in patients receiving the device in a real-life, non-RCT setting. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO database registration number CRD42025635206.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.