ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a risk model for effective immune and stromal related signature predicting prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- KLRB1 gene in tumor immune regulation and disease prognosis: a multidimensional role review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Adenosine Pathway-Based Prognostic Signature for Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Immune Microenvironment Characteristics in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Prognostic significance of bilateral carotid plaque asymmetry for major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: a 3-year retrospective cohort study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a critical role in ovarian cancer (OC) progression, yet the relationship between immune and stromal scores within the TME and prognostic outcomes remains poorly understood. Immune and stromal cell scores were computed using the "estimate" R package, which enabled the assessment of immune and stromal components in OC samples. We then performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify prognostic factors associated with these scores using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Additionally, LASSO Cox regression were employed to identify key prognostic genes linked to immune infiltration. Our analysis of OC expression data identified 1,667 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with immune and stromal scores. From these, we developed a 6-gene risk model, consisting of ALOX5AP, FCGR1C, GBP2, IL21R, KLRB1, and PIK3CG, which effectively stratified OC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Survival analysis and area under the curve (AUC) assessment confirmed the model's strong predictive accuracy. Furthermore, drug sensitivity predictions indicated that sorafenib was particularly effective in high-risk patients, with this finding validated through in vitro experiments. The 6-gene TME-related risk model offers robust prognostic capabilities for OC and could serve as a valuable tool for clinical stratification and personalized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.